EthicShare Community
Ethics. Research. Community.
Username:
*
Password:
*
Create a free account.
Forgot password?
Search for articles, books and other materials:
Open Advanced Search
Close Advanced Search
KEYWORDS:
TITLE:
Last Name, First Name
AUTHOR:
ex: Stem Cell AND Humans AND United States
SUBJECT:
JOURNAL:
VOLUME:
ISSUE:
YYYY-YYYY
YEAR:
Home
Calendar
Search Results
Jobs
Share
About
Collections
Help
Results for: Subject:Family
14 Items Found
view per page
Relevancy
Title A-Z
Title Z-A
Date Published - Newest First
Date Published - Oldest First
Journal Name A-Z
Journal Name Z-A
Date Posted - Oldest First
Date Posted - Newest First
Sort by:
Withholding Treatment (Subject)
Export to:
Text File
EndNote
RefWorks
Select All
1.
Debate on euthanasia encouraged in Japan.
Gutierrez, Ed
Lancet.
349
(9049):
409;
1997 Feb 8.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Aged
;
Attitude
;
Empathy
;
Euthanasia
;
Euthanasia, Active
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Japan
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mass Media
;
Mental Competency
;
Motivation
;
Neoplasms
;
Nutritional Support
;
Pain
;
Patients
;
Physicians
;
Reference Standards
;
Stress, Psychological
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Aged
;
Attitude
;
Empathy
;
Euthanasia
;
Euthanasia, Active
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Japan
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mass Media
;
Mental Competency
;
Motivation
;
Neoplasms
;
Nutritional Support
;
Pain
;
Patients
;
Physicians
;
Reference Standards
;
Stress, Psychological
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Withholding Treatment
;
2.
Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White, Patricia D
Utah law review.
1992
(3):
849-60;
1992.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Advance Directives
;
Coma
;
Critical Illness
;
Decision Making
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Friends
;
Goals
;
Humans
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Living Wills
;
Mental Competency
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Physicians
;
Probability
;
Prognosis
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Uncertainty
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Advance Directives
;
Coma
;
Critical Illness
;
Decision Making
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Friends
;
Goals
;
Humans
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Living Wills
;
Mental Competency
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Physicians
;
Probability
;
Prognosis
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Uncertainty
;
Withholding Treatment
;
3.
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy.
American Thoracic Society
Annals of internal medicine.
115
(6):
478-85;
1991 Sept 15.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Adult
;
Advance Directives
;
Altruism
;
Beneficence
;
Critical Illness
;
Decision Making
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Medical Futility
;
Mental Competency
;
Organizational Policy
;
Patient Participation
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physician-Patient Relations
;
Physicians
;
Reference Standards
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Societies
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Adult
;
Advance Directives
;
Altruism
;
Beneficence
;
Critical Illness
;
Decision Making
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Medical Futility
;
Mental Competency
;
Organizational Policy
;
Patient Participation
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physician-Patient Relations
;
Physicians
;
Reference Standards
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Societies
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
4.
The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman, Michelle L
Journal of law and health.
1988-1989;
3
(2):
189-217;
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Empathy
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Prognosis
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Empathy
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Prognosis
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
5.
The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment.
Mead, Alice P
Clinical ethics report.
2
(1):
1-8;
1988.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Advance Directives
;
Death
;
Decision Making
;
Ethics
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia
;
Euthanasia, Active
;
Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Guidelines as Topic
;
Hospitals
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Organizational Policy
;
Pain
;
Patient Participation
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Pharmaceutical Preparations
;
Physicians
;
Public Policy
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation Orders
;
Right to Die
;
Terminal Care
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Advance Directives
;
Death
;
Decision Making
;
Ethics
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia
;
Euthanasia, Active
;
Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Guidelines as Topic
;
Hospitals
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Organizational Policy
;
Pain
;
Patient Participation
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Pharmaceutical Preparations
;
Physicians
;
Public Policy
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation Orders
;
Right to Die
;
Terminal Care
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
6.
In re Martin.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
West's north western reporter.
504 :
917-28;
1993 Jul 19.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Legal Case Document]
Database Keywords:
Advance Directives
;
Brain Diseases
;
Brain Injuries
;
Cognition
;
Comprehension
;
Decision Making
;
Dissent and Disputes
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Expert Testimony
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Group Processes
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Michigan
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physicians
;
Politics
;
Reference Standards
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Wounds and Injuries
;
Advance Directives
;
Brain Diseases
;
Brain Injuries
;
Cognition
;
Comprehension
;
Decision Making
;
Dissent and Disputes
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Expert Testimony
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Group Processes
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Jurisprudence
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Michigan
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physicians
;
Politics
;
Reference Standards
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Wounds and Injuries
;
7.
The right to death.
Dworkin, Ronald
The New York review of books.
14-7;
1991 Jan 31.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Advance Directives
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Government Regulation
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Missouri
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Social Control, Formal
;
State Government
;
Suicide
;
Suicide, Assisted
;
Supreme Court Decisions
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Advance Directives
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Government Regulation
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Missouri
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Social Control, Formal
;
State Government
;
Suicide
;
Suicide, Assisted
;
Supreme Court Decisions
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
8.
Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor, Norman L
Rutgers law review.
37
(3):
543-77;
1985.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Aged
;
Chronic Disease
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Dementia
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Institutionalization
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Liability, Legal
;
Mental Competency
;
New Jersey
;
Nursing Homes
;
Nutritional Support
;
Pain
;
Patient Advocacy
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Prognosis
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Social Values
;
Stress, Psychological
;
Suicide
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Aged
;
Chronic Disease
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Dementia
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Institutionalization
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Liability, Legal
;
Mental Competency
;
New Jersey
;
Nursing Homes
;
Nutritional Support
;
Pain
;
Patient Advocacy
;
Patients
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Prognosis
;
Quality of Life
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Social Values
;
Stress, Psychological
;
Suicide
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
Withholding Treatment
;
9.
Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a tr...
Richard, Steven M
The Notre Dame law review.
64
(3):
394-421;
1989.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Journal Article]
Database Keywords:
Advance Directives
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Dementia
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Humans
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Mentally Disabled Persons
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physicians
;
Privacy
;
Prognosis
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Advance Directives
;
Civil Rights
;
Decision Making
;
Dementia
;
Ethics Committees
;
Ethics Committees, Clinical
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Freedom
;
Humans
;
Judicial Role
;
Jurisprudence
;
Legal Guardians
;
Life Support Care
;
Mental Competency
;
Mentally Disabled Persons
;
Nutritional Support
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Personal Autonomy
;
Physicians
;
Privacy
;
Prognosis
;
Reference Standards
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
Social Values
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Value of Life
;
Withholding Treatment
;
10.
The "right to die" in America: sloganeering from Quinlan and Cruzan to Quill and Kevorkian.
Annas, George J
Duquesne law review.
34
(4):
875-97;
1996.
(English)
[Record Source:
PubMed
]
[Publication Type: Lectures & Presentations]
Database Keywords:
Anencephaly
;
Brain Death
;
Civil Rights
;
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
;
Death
;
Decision Making
;
Down Syndrome
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Informed Consent
;
Jurisprudence
;
Medical Futility
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Paternalism
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Physicians
;
Prejudice
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation Orders
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
State Government
;
Suicide, Assisted
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Ventilators, Mechanical
;
Withholding Treatment
;
Anencephaly
;
Brain Death
;
Civil Rights
;
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
;
Death
;
Decision Making
;
Down Syndrome
;
Euthanasia, Passive
;
Family
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Informed Consent
;
Jurisprudence
;
Medical Futility
;
Mental Competency
;
Nutritional Support
;
Paternalism
;
Patients
;
Persistent Vegetative State
;
Physicians
;
Prejudice
;
Reference Standards
;
Resuscitation Orders
;
Right to Die
;
Risk
;
Risk Assessment
;
State Government
;
Suicide, Assisted
;
Terminally Ill
;
Third-Party Consent
;
Treatment Refusal
;
United States
;
Ventilators, Mechanical
;
Withholding Treatment
;
1
2
next ›
last »
Library Link Preference
We are unable to automatically set a
Library Link Preference
for you.
Log In/Register
to configure this setting manually.
Filter by Type
Journal Article (12)
Report/Government/Legal (1)
Teaching/Conference Materials (1)
Filter by Subtype
Address (1)
Article (1)
News (1)
Review (1)
Filter by Author
American Thoracic Society (1)
Annas, George J (1)
Braithwaite, Susan S (1)
Brock, Dan W (1)
Buchanan, Allen (1)
Cantor, Norman L (1)
Dworkin, Ronald (1)
Gutierrez, Ed (1)
Mead, Alice P (1)
Meisel, Alan (1)
Michigan. Court of Appeals (1)
Oxman, Michelle L (1)
Richard, Steven M (1)
Walter, James J (1)
White, Patricia D (1)
Filter by Subject
Euthanasia, Passive (14)
Family (14)
Humans (14)
Mental Competency - Selected
Patients - Selected
Reference Standards - Selected
Withholding Treatment - Selected
Decision Making (13)
Third-Party Consent (13)
Jurisprudence (12)
Freedom (10)
Persistent Vegetative State (10)
Personal Autonomy (10)
Physicians (10)
Nutritional Support (9)
Treatment Refusal (9)
Advance Directives (8)
Life Support Care (8)
Risk (8)
Risk Assessment (8)
Terminally Ill (8)
Prognosis (7)
Right to Die (7)
Aged (6)
Civil Rights (6)
Informed Consent (6)
Social Values (6)
Judicial Role (5)
Pain (5)
Quality of Life (5)
United States (5)
Ethics (4)
Ethics Committees (4)
Ethics Committees, Clinical (4)
Public Policy (4)
Stress, Psychological (4)
Suicide, Assisted (4)
Value of Life (4)
Altruism (3)
Beneficence (3)
Chronic Disease (3)
Critical Illness (3)
Dementia (3)
Empathy (3)
Euthanasia (3)
Euthanasia, Active (3)
Interpersonal Relations (3)
Legal Guardians (3)
Organizational Policy (3)
Resuscitation Orders (3)
Filter by Journal Name
Annals of internal medicine (1)
Clinical ethics report (1)
Duquesne law review (1)
European journal of health law (1)
Journal of law and health (1)
Lancet (1)
Religious studies review (1)
Rutgers law review (1)
The Journal of clinical ethics (1)
The Milbank quarterly (1)
The New York review of books (1)
The Notre Dame law review (1)
Utah law review (1)
West's north western reporter (1)
Filter by Year Published
1997 (1)
1996 (2)
1993 (1)
1992 (1)
1991 (3)
1990 (1)
1989 (1)
1988 (2)
1986 (1)
1985 (1)
Filter by Language
English (14)
